Monolog / Seb

[Sebastien Chassande-Barrioz <sebastien.chassandebarrioz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi jeff,

I subscribed you to the monolog team as developper. Welcome !
Therefore to solve your problem you can add an xml file in the archive 
directory in order to generate a new jar file which will contain all 
monolog classes that you want. I do not have the time to do this. It is 
a small contribution that you can do ? isn't it ? (10 minutes to do this)

I am tired to be alone to support Monolog ! Monolog is a project wanted 
by the architecture college. Monolog MUST BE SUPPORTED BY SEVERAL 
OBJECTWEB MEMBERS !!!! It is not a Seb's project ! You can contribute also.

best regards,
Seb
PS: Jeff, I am not especialy angry against you, simply Objectweb must 
assume its choice and you are an Objectweb members.

Jeff Mesnil wrote:
> hi,
>
> > N'y aurait il pas là un problème de packaging dans monolog?
> >
> > Ne serait il pas possible d'avoir un seul jar pour jonas
> > je sais que c'est une vieille demande qui n'est surement pas
> > acceptable...
>
>
> I backup Philippe on that one.
> We're using Monolog in JOTM. I'm currently changing the way we log to 
> reflect changes in JOnAS (it makes log messages clearer and simpler to 
> configure).
>
> However, to do that, I need 4 jars files:
> o log4j.jar
> o ow_util_log_file.jar
> o ow_util_log_wrp_log4j.jar
> o ow_util_log_wrp_pw.jar
>
> 4 jar files in JOTM distribution are dedicated to logs (on a total of 11).
> It seems to be too much just for logging (36%!!)...
>
> So, I'd like to know if it would be possible to have only *one* Monolog 
> jar file with everything. The size of the 3 files is more or less 38K 
> with some duplicated classes.
> Of course, I can do that on my own in JOTM but I would prefer a general 
> solution rather a fix suited for each and every project...
>
> I understand that Seb has much more important work to do now.
> But the thing is that there is nobody else inside or outside Monolog 
> who's contributing to Monolog.
> So wouldn't it be more interesting to have a common logging framework 
> which is actively supported, e.g. commons-logging[1] from Jakarta?
> Even it has some problems, wouldn't it be more interesting to contribute 
> to that one so that it matches our concerns rather than duplicating 
> efforts?
>
> just want to be helpful,
> jeff
>
> [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging.html
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
Sebastien Chassande-Barrioz
Ingenieur Recherche et Developpement
Branche Developpement/FTR&D/DTL/ASR
28 chemin du Vieux Chene - B.P. 98
38243 Meylan CEDEX - France
phone: +33 4 76 76 26 57 - fax: +33 4 76 76 45 57
email: sebastien.chassandebarrioz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
email: sebastien.chassande-barrioz@xxxxxxxxxxx