Re: [ObjectWeb architecture] Clustering meeting October 2, 2003

[Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel.Cecchet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Denis Caromel wrote:

> Emmanuel.Cecchet@xxxxxxxxxxxx said:
>  
>
> > - JavaGroups performance report (Takoua Abdellatif)
> >    
>
> If you evaluate the performance of JavaGroup, can you evaluate and 
> compare as well to the ObjectWeb ProActive Group implementation ?
Do you have documentation and benchmarks available for ProActive Group 
communication? How does it compare to JavaGroups ?
The goal of the JavaGroups implementation is to study its scalability as 
it is used for Tomcat clustering, JOnAS clustering and C-JDBC 
clustering. It is an important input for us to know how clustering 
solutions based on this technology can scale. If ProActive Group 
communication could be a replacement for JavaGroups, that would be 
interesting to include it in the evaluation. Do you have people that 
could provide support and benchmarks ?

Emmanuel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature