Re-4: [ObjectWeb architecture] just an idea for (Java) native compilation

[<markus.karg@xxxxxxxxx>]

So what you actually want to do with that OCaml thing is to make JOnAS server 
run as an embedded controller? Sounds cool. :-) But actually it might be a 
problem porting all that enterprise APIs into the limited RAM of an embedded 
controller...?

Have Fun
Markus

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Re-2: [ObjectWeb architecture] just an idea for (Java) native 
compilation (26-Sep-2003 8:53)
From:    jeanphilippe.fassino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To:      markus.karg@xxxxxxxxx

>
> Le vendredi, 26 sep 2003, à 05:49 Europe/Paris, <markus.karg@xxxxxxxxx>
> a écrit :
>
> > So until there is a real world benchmark that showcases a valueable
> > benefit from static precompilation compared to the LATEST (!) hotspot
> > technology (not hotspot 1.3 or 1.4.2, but 1.5) I do not see that Java
> > really needs a native compiler.
>
> This is totally true if you consider server or personal computer with
> many memory. But if you consider
> embedded constraint systems where HotSpot is too large, you may need
> native compilation.
> Nevertheless, GCJ isn't the solution because it don't improve
> performance and don't need
> less memory compare to HotSpot.
>
> Best regards,
>
> JP
>
>
> --
> Jean-Philippe Fassino
> France Télécom R&D/DTL/ASR
> Ingénieur Recherche & Développement
> 28, chemin du vieux chêne
> 38243 Meylan Cedex
> Tel : + 33 (0) 4 76 76 45 52
> Fax : + 33 (0) 4 76 76 45 57
> http;//www.francetelecom.com/rd
>
>
> To: markus.karg@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: jeanphilippe.fassino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     architecture@xxxxxxxxxxxxx