Re: [ObjectWeb architecture] Re: [jonas] Re: licenses for ObjectWeb components & Apache/OW collaboration

[Miroslav Halas <objectweb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually not only for the glue, but for glue AND services. Yes 
absolutely the more the merrier. JBoss is already suporting Jetty and 
Tomcat. Also Andy from open for business starder looking into how to 
extract Minerva (connection pool, transaction manager??? not sure) from 
JBoss to have alternative to JOTM/XAPool.

markus.karg@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/7/2003, 9:06 AM:

 > Miro,
 >
 > > Just in idea, maybe the best way is to learn from KDE/Gnome
 > coexistance.
 > > They both follow specifications and standards set by
 > > http://freedesktop.org/ to ensure interoperability. It may be
 > beneficial
 > > to come up with http://freej2ee.org/ setting up standards for
 > > interoperability of free j2ee implementations (either of glue or pieces
 > > of the stack) to make easier for all implementors to support/reuse each
 > > other's pieces. This can for example specify what form individual
 > > services take (e.g. interfaces to manage them) and what form the glue
 > > take. Lots of this is probably set by different JSR's but I am not
 > > following it to so much details so know if it even specifies details
 > how
 > > to reuse implementations of j2ee stack.
 >
 > Actually there was a JSR for the glue, but it was withdrawn. AFAIK it
 > was a communication problem between one specific EG member and the
 > spec lead. So why not just sitting together with Apache and ObjectWeb
 > restarting that JSR? Is there really a need to do it in another place
 > that the JCP? And why not asking JBoss to also join? :-)
 >
 > Have Fun
 > Markus
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > You receive this message as a subscriber of the
 > architecture@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.
 > To unsubscribe: mailto:architecture-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > For general help: mailto:sympa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help
 > ObjectWeb mailing lists service homepage: http://www.objectweb.org/wws