Re: AW: Enhydra and Jonas

[Gérard Vandome <gerard.vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Madl Alfred wrote:

> Hi !
>
> What about providing an "adapter" implementation for common-logging API to 
> the monolog API ? The idea would simply be to "redirect" calls made to the 
> common-logging API to monolog and in fact doing configuration and logging 
> level setting in monolog (I like the Jonas Web Admin GUI for setting 
> loglevels !).

It can be a good solution, if it doesn't introduce overhead.
I cc the architecture mailing list as I think the best is to move the 
discussion there.

>
> So every service / component / application / etc. using Apache 
> common-logging could use monolog without knowledge of monolog.
>
> We would also like to do the same for the Enhydra logging API..provide an 
> adapter for monolog..if monolog is the way to go. Otherwise we would have 
> to implement an adapter for common-logging...but of course I prefer to bind 
> to Objectweb technology :-) And I would like to use JonasAdmin for 
> configuration of logging levels of my web-apps !
>
> Of course the implementation of such an adapter would have to be VERY 
> efficient in order to avoid unnecessary overhead for logging calls !
>
> Just an idea.
>
> Alfred
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Gérard Vandome [mailto:gerard.vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2003 14:14
> An: Madl Alfred
> Cc: christophe.ney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Raicevic Igor; FRANCOIS EXERTIER; Andre 
> Freyssinet; Jeff Mesnil; FRANCOIS EXERTIER
> Betreff: Re: Enhydra and Jonas
>
> Madl Alfred wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > Christophe told me, you could possibly help me:
> >
> > We would have some technical/architecture oriented questions for
> > integrating Enhydra 6.0 (the Enhydra application framework) into
> > Jonas/Tomcat in the area of "logging".
> >
> > Jonas itself uses the "Objectweb monolog API"
> > Tomcat itself uses the "Apache common-logging API"
> > Enhydra EAF has ist own logging API for web applications (currently
> > implemented for log4j)
> >
> > I would like to discuss the relationship of these APIs and possible
> > architecture scenarios in this area for the Enhydra/Jonas integration.
> >
> > Do you know the best guy to talk to for these questions ? Could I call
> > him to discuss that ?
> >
>
> It is a very good question, and I am not happy at all with the current 
> JOnAS situation which is still more complicated: JOnAS is also integrating 
> Axis (which are using common logging) and JORAM and JORM (which are using 
> Monolog). JOnAS will soon integrate JOTM (instead of the JOnAS embedded 
> transaction manager) and C-JDBC which are using common logging..
>
> Just an history to explain the current situation:
> -ObjectWeb provide Monolog to be able to use either Log4J or JDK logger 
> -then Apache provide Common-Log with the same goal
>
> The curent  ObjectWeb recommandation is to use Monolog, but my personnal 
> preference would be to move everything in JOnAS to common-logging. I cc 
> François, Andre and Jef who have more technical arguments....
>
> Gérard Vandôme
> ObjectWeb Consortium www.objectweb.org Gerard.Vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx +33 
> (0)4 76 29 76 25

--
Gérard Vandôme
ObjectWeb Consortium www.objectweb.org
Gerard.Vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx +33 (0)4 76 29 76 25