Mail Archive Home | architecture List | December 2003 Index
| <-- Date Index --> | <-- Thread Index --> |
Begin forwarded message:
From: Philippe Merle <Philippe.Merle@xxxxxxx> Date: Jeu nov 27, 2003 11:56:19 Europe/Paris To: Gérard Vandome <gerard.vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Trent.Shue@xxxxxxxx" <Trent.Shue@xxxxxxxx>, college@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [college] Fwd: [webmaster] New SourceForge project submittedHi, Gérard Vandome wrote:As the request is done by Bull Phoenix peope who are working within my team, I canalready give you some intial answers.. Philippe Merle wrote:Hi, In my previous message, I have asked some questions to the submitter of the new project. If you have more questions don't hesitate to ask them to him (with a copy to the college mailing list). Perhaps this time we could be proactive, e.g. push synergy between ObjectWeb activities instead of having two things doing similar work.It is not similar to monolog: monolog is a wrapper, the proposed project is animplementation for high speed transaction and database logging.As I understand, MonoLog is composed of to part: * A set of API independent of the underlaying logging systems * A set of wrappers converting MonoLog API to existing logging systems So it is possible to develop another implementation of MonoLog API which fully implement the underlaying logging system. Do you thing that a high performance logging must have specific API? If yes, where the MonoLog API is not appropriate? This information could be very helpful for logging system designers.For me, MonoLog API is not incompatible with high performance journal.Or if this is incompatible, I need to understand why?Perhaps some interfaces can be shared, but interfaces providing high speed login was not in the scope of monolog, so perhaps they don't fit. It is part of the project to definethat.Interfaces define operations that applications could use. There is no obstacle to implement a set of API in a performant way. So I strongly suggest the new project to investigate MonoLog API to clearly show us why this is not appropriate for high performance logging.The BSD licence is proposed because this project is done within the scope of the collaboration between ObjectWeb and Apache.It will be used by JOTM which will be usedboth by JonAS and Geronimo.OK I see.It can be also relevant for FileDB, GOTM, etc...There is currently no implementation, but it is expected to start as soon as the project is created, as contributors have a strong experience in transaction logging for main-frame transactional systems. It will then be used to implement JOTM recovery.I have a minor comment on the name, as "High Speed Journal" is rather long...I would like to have a more mnemonic a short project name. Gérard Vandôme ObjectWeb Consortium www.objectweb.org Gerard.Vandome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx +33 (0)4 76 29 76 25A+ Philippe Merle -- __________________________________________________ Dr. Philippe Merle - INRIA Scientist Researcher at Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille UPRESA 8022 CNRS - U.F.R. I.E.E.A. - Batiment M3 Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX France Phone: (33) (0)3 20 33 70 24 Fax: (33) (0)3 20 43 65 66 E-Mail: Philippe.Merle@xxxxxxx Home Page: http://www.lifl.fr/~merle See also: http://www.objectweb.org/ http://corbaweb.lifl.fr/ __________________________________________________ --You receive this message as a subscriber of the college@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.To unsubscribe: mailto:college-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx For general help: mailto:sympa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
| <-- Date Index --> | <-- Thread Index --> |
Powered by MHonArc.
Copyright © 1999-2005, ObjectWeb Consortium | contact | webmaster.