Re: [architecture] wrapper APIs

[Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Emmanuel,

On Friday 25 June 2004 10:02, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
> ... we could also say that finally log4j is becoming the defacto
> standard and why would we need a wrapper for it?

You're stealing words out of my mouth.

Put another way[1],

    "When you try to unify two opposing forces by creating a third
    alternative, you just end up with three opposing forces. You
    haven't unified anything and you haven't really fixed anything."

Thanks,
Vadim


References
  1. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html