RE: [enhydra] eclipse IDE

[Jeremy Ferry <jferry@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm glad to hear that everything has been updated for Eclipse 3.1.2. The
only thing that would make me happier is if I could actually download and
use it ;-) It's been a couple of weeks now since this message, what's the
hold up? I'm eager to try it with the project I'm working on but I can't
until this update is released. I was going to try to get it from CVS but it
appears that those files haven't been touched in months. Do you guys even
use the ObjectWeb CVS repository?

Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: Slobodan Vujasinovic [mailto:slobodan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:43 AM
To: enhydra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [enhydra] eclipse IDE


Hi Jeremy,

"Maybe I'm not looking in the right place but it seems the only way to 
get the Enhydra IDE is through the server packages, is this correct?"

Yes!

"Are there any plans to make it available separately? An eclipse update 
site would be ideal. ;-)"

Not for now but we will consider this option :)

We have just finished release 6.6-2 which will be published in next few 
days!!
Enhydra IDE included in this release contains updated plugin versions 
with new Kelp features (debugging, hot replace, ...) and it is based on 
Eclipse 3.1.2 version.

Also, new Enhydra Kelp will be released!
Therefore, you will be able to install new Kelp into existing eclipse 
environment too (separate Enhydra Server installation is obligate in 
this case).

Regards,
  Slobodan Vujasinovic
Enhydra Development Team



Jeremy Ferry wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Maybe I'm not looking in the right place but it seems the only way to get
>the Enhdyra IDE is through the server packages, is this correct? Are there
>any plans to make it available separately? An eclipse update site would be
>ideal. ;-)
>
>I'd like to incorporate EAF and XMLC into my existing project but we use
>eclipse 3.1 and I'm really not interested in downgrading my current version
>just for Enhydra features. For the time being I'd be satisfied if I could
>install it manually into 3.1, anyone had success with this? Is an upgrade
to
>Eclipse 3.1 going to happen any time soon?
>
>Thanks,
>Jeremy
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>--
>You receive this message as a subscriber of the enhydra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailing list.
>To unsubscribe: mailto:enhydra-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For general help: mailto:sympa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help
>ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
>  
>